From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: gnome-doc-utils: Do not omit tests Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:22:23 +0200 Message-ID: <878uonn7cw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1403422253-9505-1-git-send-email-jmd@gnu.org> <87egygd973.fsf@gnu.org> <20140623044444.GA19164@jocasta.intra> <87bntknixc.fsf@gnu.org> <20140623090206.GA11345@jocasta.intra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39047) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wz3GZ-0007eZ-20 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 08:22:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wz3GU-0002bQ-9k for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 08:22:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140623090206.GA11345@jocasta.intra> (John Darrington's message of "Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:02:06 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Darrington Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, John Darrington John Darrington skribis: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:12:31AM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote: > > http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd > > others to=20 > > http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.5/docbookx.dtd > > or > > http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2.1/docbookx.dtd > > > > Similarly, I have seen urls like > > http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docboo= k.xsl > > http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/1.72/manpages/docbook.x= sl > > and other variations. >=20=20=20=20=20=20 > This seems to be a matter of providing packages for all these versio= ns, > no? >=20=20=20=20=20=20 > I suppose the catalog.xml file in the ???docbook-xml-4.4??? package = does the > right thing for the 4.4 URLs, doesn???t it? > > Presumably it would, but soo far as I'm aware, we don't have such a packa= ge. Do we? We have docbook-xml-4.5 so adding 4.4 shouldn=E2=80=99t be too hard. :-) Ludo=E2=80=99.