From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Merging wip-libreoffice Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:25:24 +0100 Message-ID: <878uf2wosb.fsf_-_@gnu.org> References: <20150309220320.GA16814@debian> <787D3051-1EA0-4CFA-8D7C-A201DB6EA50B@sumou.com> <7C40BA9C-C875-446D-B2FD-3749CF026313@sumou.com> <87mw3lm3cp.fsf@gnu.org> <26d5018175cf3d29bd0f9c99081c4841@hcoop.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVzN1-0006K5-I8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 05:25:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVzMt-0006km-Iu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 05:25:35 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53218) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVzMt-0006kE-Dk for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 05:25:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <26d5018175cf3d29bd0f9c99081c4841@hcoop.net> (=?utf-8?B?Ig==?= =?utf-8?B?55m944GE54aK77yg55u45pKy6YGTIidz?= message of "Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:01:41 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?55m944GE54aK77yg55u45pKy6YGT?= Cc: GuixSD =E7=99=BD=E3=81=84=E7=86=8A=EF=BC=A0=E7=9B=B8=E6=92=B2=E9=81=93 skribis: > On 2015-03-10 13:41, ludo@gnu.org wrote: >> "=E7=99=BD=E3=81=84=E7=86=8A @=E7=9B=B8=E6=92=B2=E9=81=93" skribis: >> >>> wget >>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/snapshot/wip-libreoffice.tar.= gz >>> guix pull --url=3Dfile:///path/to/wip-libreoffice.tar.gz >>> guix package -i libreoffice >>> >>> It's building now, apparently everything from source, so probably a >>> long way to go... >>> >>> Let's see if it will put a unable libreoffice instance in the store... >> >> Please let us know how it goes. If it builds and is usable, we should >> merge it. > > Well it did build indeed! And now I have a working LibreOffice in the > store. Tested briefly, works without a hitch so far. Excellent. I think we must rebase this branch atop master, review the changes, and merge it. What do people think? Anyone would like to do this? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.