From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?=
	=?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Various
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:22:02 +0100
Message-ID: <878uek22o5.fsf@taylan.uni.cx>
References: <87sicx2qqz.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> <87384t2v40.fsf@taylan.uni.cx>
	<87k2y5t465.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhik27kt.fsf@taylan.uni.cx>
	<87twx8iz8i.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55274)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <taylanbayirli@gmail.com>) id 1YaskZ-0001hw-AK
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:22:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <taylanbayirli@gmail.com>) id 1YaskY-0004hE-04
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:22:07 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87twx8iz8i.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:44:13 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:

> taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer") skribi=
s:
>
>> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:
>>
>>>> +       (uri (string-append "http://www.leptonica.com/source/leptonica=
-"
>>>> +                           version ".tar.gz"))
>>>
>>> Really, they didn=E2=80=99t use =E2=80=98make dist=E2=80=99?
>>
>> I don't understand; what does make dist do differently?
>
> A tarball generated by =E2=80=98make dist=E2=80=99 (like most tarballs of=
 GNU packages)
> already has a =E2=80=98configure=E2=80=99 script and Makefile templates; =
thus it doesn=E2=80=99t
> depend on Autoconf, Automake, etc.
>
> However, this package recipe explicitly adds Autoconf, Automake, and
> Libtool as inputs, plus it runs =E2=80=98autoreconf=E2=80=99.  So I suspe=
ct this is
> because upstream=E2=80=99s tarball isn=E2=80=99t self-contained, right?
>
> Ludo=E2=80=99.

Oh, I did that because otherwise I get the following at start of the
build phase:

(CDPATH=3D"${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /gnu/store/nq6idcqwqc9x6z7g9jxq11a=
58jqx6w8x-bash-4.3.33/bin/bash /tmp/nix-build-leptonica-1.71.drv-1/leptonic=
a-1.71/config/missing --run autoheader)
aclocal.m4:17: warning: this file was generated for autoconf 2.68.
You have another version of autoconf.  It may work, but is not guaranteed t=
o.
If you have problems, you may need to regenerate the build system entirely.
To do so, use the procedure documented by the package, typically `autorecon=
f'.

However, it seems to build fine in the end.  Should I remove the
autoreconf phase?

Taylan