From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: New =?utf-8?B?4oCYZ3VpeCBncmFwaOKAmQ==?= command
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 22:46:37 +0200
Message-ID: <878u8n1b9u.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87io8164s0.fsf@gnu.org> <20150903203232.GA25036@debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49040)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ZXbP9-0002Ef-Cb
	for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:46:44 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ZXbP6-0005xD-6S
	for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:46:43 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20150903203232.GA25036@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Thu,
	3 Sep 2015 22:32:32 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: Guix-devel <Guix-devel@gnu.org>

Hey!

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> Very neat indeed! A tiny bit of nitpicking: Would it not be preferable if
> the arrows were reversed, from the inputs to the dependent packages?

Dunno, maybe the graph people would choose the other direction but I
like it this way, looks more =E2=80=9Cintuitive=E2=80=9D to me.  What do pe=
ople think?

Ludo=E2=80=99.