Ludovic Courtès (2015-09-14 16:34 +0300) wrote:

> Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:
[...]
>> Also our 'guix' executable will be changed, I'm not sure what
>> consequences it will lead to.
>
> I knew I’d overlook something: That’s a showstopper.  Basically, ‘guix
> pull’ assumes that ‘guix’ is immutable.  Maybe we can break it once
> before 1.0, but in the meantime, I’d rather avoid it.
>
> That means ‘guix-main’ must remain in (guix ui).  Consequently, a bunch
> of other procedures (show-*, run-guix-command, commands) should remain
> there, to avoid a circular dependency between (guix scripts) and (guix
> ui).
>
> WDYT?  Could you try to adjust the patch accordingly?

OK, the updated patch is attached, thanks.