From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Funding the build farm Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:20:31 +0100 Message-ID: <878u5vj97k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20150422114635.GA24566@thebird.nl> <20151011074654.GA8058@thebird.nl> <87wputz1uj.fsf@gnu.org> <20151011212714.GA9401@thebird.nl> <87d1wk8y7e.fsf@netris.org> <20151012060607.GA11012@thebird.nl> <871td0auiw.fsf@gnu.org> <20151013121140.GA18001@thebird.nl> <20151013125258.GA5574@debian> <87eggyomym.fsf@gnu.org> <20151118161507.GA25174@thebird.nl> <87mvubma8s.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <4e55df098af3485eb77fdbe66a687f09@exchsrv2.sgc.loc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48157) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzA9e-0003XL-KL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:20:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzA9a-0007Kl-NC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:20:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4e55df098af3485eb77fdbe66a687f09@exchsrv2.sgc.loc> (Malcolm Cook's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:38:09 +0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Cook, Malcolm" Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" "Cook, Malcolm" skribis: > I don't know what kind of $ we're talking about, nor quite how to interpr= et all those up and down thumbs at lwn.net, but (once I've finally deployed= guix) I'll certainly go to bat with my institute to free up some funding.= =20 Thanks for your support! Initially, we=E2=80=99re talking about: 1. One big server, along the lines of 8 cores, 32G of RAM, and a fast 4T drive (around 4=E2=80=935k=E2=82=AC maybe?). 2. Hosting, which needs to be figured out more precisely, but could be in the 0=E2=80=932k=E2=82=AC range per year depending on what we choos= e. That=E2=80=99s the back-of-the-envelope calculation. What do people think? Ludo=E2=80=99.