From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: pcmanfm version update Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 23:31:02 +0200 Message-ID: <878u0hci21.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87shyvrww4.fsf@gmail.com> <71ca60a5ce463ec85842355bdf5d86c6@openmailbox.org> <87bn5i4u2u.fsf@gmail.com> <20160409171958.GA25062@solar> <20160409195903.GC7587@debian-netbook> <20160410010619.GB29029@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50038) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqSNU-0002ag-N7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 17:31:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqSNU-000842-0E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 17:31:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160410010619.GB29029@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sat, 9 Apr 2016 21:06:19 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Alex Kost , rain1@openmailbox.org Leo Famulari skribis: > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 10:59:03PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> We do have some packages that have to be updated together, acme and >> letsencrypt, python-cryptography and python-cryptography-vectors. But >> those do have a commit message that they are updated together. > > If those packages were updated separately, the build would break after > the first commit. Neither of those package pairs works if the versions > are not in sync [0]. > > In my opinion, that is a valid reason for updating multiple packages in > the same commit. If that is the case (I wouldn=E2=80=99t be surprised), I agree it=E2=80=99s= a valid reason. Anyway, it=E2=80=99s no big deal, so we shouldn=E2=80=99t block otherwise uncontroversial and non-disrupting patches for 1 week just because of this IMO. Thoughts? Someone applies it? :-) Ludo=E2=80=99.