From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] Emacs packages! Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 17:31:18 +0200 Message-ID: <878tx1ioqh.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20160712210514.21310-1-rekado@elephly.net> <878tx3x8fd.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58865) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bORYw-0001qp-GN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 11:31:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bORYt-0005fT-7o for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 11:31:30 -0400 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:24601) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bORYt-0005f4-0N for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 11:31:27 -0400 In-reply-to: <878tx3x8fd.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost writes: > Ricardo Wurmus (2016-07-13 00:04 +0300) wrote: > >> Hi Guix, >> >> here are almost all of the remaining Emacs packages that I previously >> installed via package.el. I hope you find them useful! >> >> ~~ Ricardo >> >> Ricardo Wurmus (17): >> gnu: Add emacs-el-mock. >> gnu: Add emacs-espuds. >> gnu: Add emacs-expand-region. >> gnu: Add emacs-fill-column-indicator. >> gnu: Add emacs-znc. >> gnu: Add emacs-paren-face. >> gnu: Add emacs-page-break-lines. >> gnu: Add emacs-simple-httpd. >> gnu: Add emacs-skewer-mode. >> gnu: Add emacs-rich-minority. >> gnu: Add emacs-smart-mode-line. >> gnu: Add emacs-shut-up. >> gnu: Add emacs-undercover. >> gnu: Add emacs-shell-switcher. >> gnu: Add emacs-tagedit. >> gnu: Add emacs-perspective. >> gnu: Add emacs-solarized-theme. > > Overall, the packages look good to me, thanks! > > My main question is about adding to inputs libraries that are not needed > for the packages themselves, as I wrote in the replies. Thank you for the review. I added inputs that are needed for the tests mostly because I didn’t understand the error messages or warnings during the build phase. I wanted to avoid skipped files in the compilation process, so I added all these development inputs like “espuds”. It’s good to know I may leave them off. Thanks for the helpful comments. I’ll update the patches and push them. ~~ Ricardo