From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Subject: Re: mingw guile.exe cross build patch series v9 Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 17:41:23 +0200 Message-ID: <878tw6vtjw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160809064139.27872-1-janneke@gnu.org> <87h9augx91.fsf@igalia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43086) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bX9A6-0007eU-Cd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 11:41:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bX9A1-00081h-JK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 11:41:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h9augx91.fsf@igalia.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Tue, 09 Aug 2016 10:30:34 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Andy Wingo Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Alex Kost Andy Wingo writes: >> Now that core-updates has been merged the mingw cross patches build agai= n. > > All looks fine to me, though Alex's nits are good of course I'd be happy > to have this in Guix and then we work on it some more in place. I have addressed all but one of Alex's comments, but not having to rebuild and retest with all these 11 patches would be very nice! > Note that Guile 2.0 should now support `open-pipe' with MinGW and thus > we will need a static-bash at some point. I don't think Guix has > updated to that Guile yet though, and probably we need to roll a new > release actually to fix a couple more MinGW things. Bash for MinGW...fun :-) Greetings, Jan --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.nl= =20=20