From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/43] gnu: Add ghc-bytestring. Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 22:22:42 +0000 Message-ID: <878tv43byl.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> References: <20160904161742.27197-1-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160904161742.27197-19-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160905203727.GC3392@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57845) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhOlS-0004kl-QX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 18:22:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhOlQ-0002cm-CL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 18:22:45 -0400 Received: from mithlond.libertad.in-berlin.de ([2001:67c:1400:2490::1]:40345 helo=beleriand.n0.is) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhOlQ-0002cW-1h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 18:22:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160905203727.GC3392@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 04:17:18PM +0000, ng0 wrote: >> * gnu/packages/haskell.scm (ghc-bytestring): New variable. > >> + (arguments >> + `(#:tests? #f)) ; Test number two becomes non-responsive for 20+ minutes > > I have used `strace -f` to check if long-running quiet tests are > actually working or if they are stuck. That could help here. How did you do this in the build? Or did you, what I suspect and would do, just run it without the guix build, the "normal" way? > And, if it's stuck, can you ask upstream if it's a bug? Yes, of course. -- ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org