From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Re: Guile 2.0.13 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 11:20:05 -0500 Message-ID: <878tttczey.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <8760oxpwsd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40287) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buMGa-0000cF-Ja for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:20:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buMGW-0007iz-JT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:20:28 -0400 In-reply-to: <8760oxpwsd.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Given that core-updates with Guile 2.0.12 is on its way and that master > is still at 2.0.11, I=E2=80=99d suggest to leave master as-is and focus= on > core-updates. > > There we have 2 options: > > 1. Changing =E2=80=98guile-2.0/fixed=E2=80=99 to 2.0.13, but 1,310 pa= ckages depend on it. > > 2. Grafting 2.0.13, which is doable since 2.0.12 and .13 have the sam= e ABI. > > I have a preference for #2. I think grafting is fine! - Chris