From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Subject: Re: Preparing for 0.12.0
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:48:15 +0100
Message-ID: <878ts0uae8.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
References: <87twapkugs.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87d1hdt7u9.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20161130162747.GA8341@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55418)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1cC8zV-0008HV-Fv
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:48:22 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1cC8zS-0005dq-CT
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:48:21 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20161130162747.GA8341@jasmine>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:28:46PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>> > So what are the next steps?  I think mainly we should be freezing
>> > =E2=80=98staging=E2=80=99 today (let=E2=80=99s see if there are packag=
es to =E2=80=9Cungraft=E2=80=9D!) and
>> > start building it in the hope of merging it next week.  If everything
>> > goes well, we can release after that.
>
> Yes, let's stick the schedule :)
>
>> A quick grep for 'replacement' digs up these grafts:
>>=20
>> * cairo      (1059 rebuilds)
>> * curl       (1356 rebuilds)
>> * cyrus-sasl (1360 rebuilds)
>> * dbus       (1187 rebuilds)
>> * guile@2.0  (1457 rebuilds)
>> * libtiff    (1672 rebuilds)
>> * libxslt    (2765 rebuilds)
>> * pixman     (1061 rebuilds)
>> * ruby       (344 rebuilds)
>>=20
>> There is probably a fair bit of overlap between cairo, dbus and pixman.
>> Are these OK for staging? Ruby is an obvious candidate, I'll do that.
>
> I think it's okay to ungraft those packages on staging. Thanks Marius!

Done! I took the liberty of merging 'master' as well to get the recent
cairo graft. Luckily no conflicts. Also updated dbus to the latest
stable '1.10.14' (from 1.10.12).

Apparently ruby was already ungrafted.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlg/EN8ACgkQoqBt8qM6
VPqSGQf/dKfdGbBC18/9bOL9dTIocskOgpgnu5wJDaHqVEI1wlVQvOVHftahkJvE
JjRbJax0kTDIltgoe2GnCoXfMn0d9q7kRo4rbLFZNIbzHzn07zOuuSEQfS3hL4PO
zzpHdrv9CkEhDHW6/6XqsMQQayCaj+Zul8DkGXOiioTuXB+PEvn/H5ULWYOSs6Hi
qCW5Pf+egd/bh//zy9mF8tQAmWRojGctHCQgD9EtyQxsu7le3xYEkTJlla5dwrk5
NoUmfyMmmPuNUYIDmbTgRfDt4rliNDcBhu5nZqz5tph+Htg1NDE3FGo+SWpHssUl
bGW4zQ6fveG+M6bIv8e++aOwNCIZLQ==
=NjaY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--