From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add openvpn service.
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 21:25:26 +0300
Message-ID: <878tqcrxih.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <20170112175714.3855-1-julien@lepiller.eu>
	<20170112175714.3855-2-julien@lepiller.eu> <87bmvarged.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20170114143938.45d8f59e@lepiller.eu> <87pojpjq9m.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40019)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1cSpUh-0004Vr-Fl
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 13:25:32 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1cSpUe-0004Ek-7s
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 13:25:31 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87pojpjq9m.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sat, 14 Jan 2017 22:16:53 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2017-01-14 22:16 +0100) wrote:

>> +(define (uglify-field-name name)
>> +  (match name
>> +         ('verbosity "verb")
>> +         (_ (let ((str (symbol->string name)))
>> +              (if (string-suffix? "?" str)
>> +                  (substring str 0 (1- (string-length str)))
>> +                  str)))))
>
> Not sure why but indent-code.el got =E2=80=98match=E2=80=99 indentation w=
rong, although
> it works for me.  Alex, any ideas?

Because 'scheme-mode' does not provide indentation rules for 'match'
(and many other keywords).  Geiser indents 'match' properly for you.

--=20
Alex