Re: 02/02: gnu: Add s.

[Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>]

kei@openmailbox.org (Kei Kebreau) writes:

> kkebreau pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
>
> commit 0e4591bb696a36bc83f75869dd2711987b17b722
> Author: ng0 <ng0@no-reply.pragmatique.xyz>
> Date:   Tue May 16 22:28:58 2017 +0000
>
>     gnu: Add s.
>     
>     * gnu/packages/shells.scm (s): New variable.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Kei Kebreau <kei@openmailbox.org>
> ---
>  gnu/packages/shells.scm | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/shells.scm b/gnu/packages/shells.scm
> index 5eeb186..5e04e86 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/shells.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/shells.scm
> @@ -503,6 +503,67 @@ Its features include:
>  @end enumerate\n")
>      (license bsd-2)))
>  
> +(define-public s
> +  (let ((commit "6604341edb3a775ff94415762af3ee9bd86bfb3c")
> +        (revision "1"))
> +    (package
> +      (name "s")
> +      (version (string-append "0.0.0-" revision "." (string-take commit 7)))

I think we should rename this package and variable name to 's-shell' or
something along those lines.  's' is commonly used as a local variable
name.  Single character variable names are in short supply, and I don't
think we should allocate them to packages.

Thoughts?

      Mark