From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: 0.14.1?
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 10:41:34 +0100
Message-ID: <878tb6dfld.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20180304174551.GA1521@macbook41>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49401)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1esmco-0006rM-SR
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 04:41:45 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1esmck-0006LX-7p
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 04:41:42 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a0c:e300::1]:43550)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1esmcj-0006LJ-WD
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 04:41:38 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20180304174551.GA1521@macbook41> (Efraim Flashner's message of
	"Sun, 4 Mar 2018 19:45:51 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hello,

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:

> We now have aarch64 build machines, but there wasn't one when 0.14.0 was
> released. This means that if someone installs guix on aarch64 and tries
> to run 'guix pull' then they have to build from the bootstrap binaries
> to guix before pulling and then compiling HEAD.  I tried this myself on
> Scaleway, which offers aarch64 VMs, and was met by test errors.

I=E2=80=99m all for 0.14.1 (we initially wanted to do that by FOSDEM=E2=80=
=A6).

I would like to add the new Shepherd as well, which should be ready
anytime soon.

Thoughts?

> Also, for aarch64 at least, berlin.guixsd.org should be added to the
> default substitute servers.

I=E2=80=99ve pushed a change to default to berlin.guixsd.org on aarch64.  P=
eople
still need to authorize the right key, though.

Ludo=E2=80=99.