From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Subject: Re: glibc 2.29 needs Python Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2019 10:48:06 +0200 Message-ID: <878sulsncp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ftowrztr.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvdcji38.fsf@elephly.net> <87pnnyjmru.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38847) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hWzgS-00026s-Kt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jun 2019 04:48:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87pnnyjmru.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sat, 01 Jun 2019 00:13:09 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: Hi! >>> I started looking at what it would take to upgrade glibc to 2.29 on >>> =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99. Bad news: it depends on Python. >> >> I had to check the date. This is for real? > > It=E2=80=99s not a June 1st prank, I swear! Oh, great... not. >> I=E2=80=99ll take a look at python-on-guile and see if we can run the sc= ripts >> with it. > > That=E2=80=99d be sweet! Yes! ... Although...how are we -- in the far future -- going to replace Guile with Mes for the Guix bootstrap? Could it be that the glibc developers haven't seen my talk? :-/ janneke --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.com