From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: Re: 02/02: gnu: next: Compress the executable.
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 10:06:13 +0200
Message-ID: <878sqxq4ga.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
References: <20190905095602.15524.75425@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <20190905095603.AC57A209A5@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <874l1qgc1j.fsf@elephly.net> <871rwuc3es.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87blvu32qm.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48759)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1i7Egl-0007rX-Ix
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 04:06:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1i7Egk-0003AP-3N
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 04:06:19 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87blvu32qm.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hmmm, OK, but why would indirect dependencies be garbage-collected?

Also in the case of Next there is something fishy: direct dependencies
include none of the Common Lisp libraries, and none of them _depends
indirectly_ on the those libraries, so how come they show up in the
listing of indirect dependencies?

=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl12B/UACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH8UnQf+Kvcfyl0qYqPsqWT/LnX1rCcFp+0P5KgPvx/jFXntggEmUtsglNxvqXiG
EXfXBa+K+oIyo5NsdyJR7Ad/JXU/nUAmMYPi/9usKieXPXKKgdaWonpw9Y/cx8sP
NTT015Dx2XJKoZbrlZ9NGrbt/IMVOvnoJJ2Xpietb42FbkopoqrMKOAO7EnGZlrZ
CcYAOO5pVysCRryCMmXhfoVKG3gcp0ktxvAsTw88Vyc7m3A2zJh/CKnfG9dbt1JP
OYfbRMYhmOciRQA35cvmoPwMFOOKt1EztwDt6YafdocjTFzvVlzAOIcoEdeX3ybr
5qGIwvMDay1GPWox+s1iMjeCSoXuSQ==
=HeuA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--