From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Baines Subject: Re: [rb-general] Quick reproducible test for GNU Guix Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 08:58:13 +0000 Message-ID: <878sl818t6.fsf@cbaines.net> References: <87o8uauh9w.fsf@ponder> <87k14t1967.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41542) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j1nqf-0005eC-Ab for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 03:58:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j1nqe-0001bI-5c for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 03:58:21 -0500 In-reply-to: <87k14t1967.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Cc: rb-general@lists.reproducible-builds.org, Vagrant Cascadian --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >> Eventually, I'd like to do more systematic test of guix packages, with >> published logs per-package, rather than whatever I happened to build on >> the system so far, but this was a quick start to help flesh out ideas >> for feature requests to "guix challenge" to make this all easier... more >> on that soon! > > That=E2=80=99d be great! > > Related to that, Christopher Baines developed a nice feature for the > Guix Data Service during and after the summit: for each Guix revision, > there=E2=80=99s a page showing the overall package reproducibility status= based > on the info obtained from our two independent build farms. The URL is > something like > > (right now it=E2=80=99s empty for some reason, but normally it shows > identical/different/inconclusive percentages.) Hey, This should be back working now. I changed how cross derivations are stored and handled, and that broke this page. It's now back showing at least something, but there's still some work to do before it's showing representative data. Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAl5DviVfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9XejpQ//Q/rVv6z4tdxPDCq8x+M5/Jx89UBeIzt6fgK/YyFmTxNB1Kp+1hUvzmta PLNbfT02xbO+sPO8GoyM/kRghvKpHeeysouZCzzGVxLLnwjpnz2tvHEEAo8kHO70 xUURSQ478fUMouUuYLteNDbKcIqBXKSLHRaENN3EIgqDxy5WIUlKp935m+NLIDXL V6v4t3oifstsYBeARM6TJl2FNnz2Fhcy3HT+kIReoyakgDY8qZZURqlTVLGZhCO7 SaZJtM6+eOgOK98SmqFOL3hpvWylrijgJ3wQNI1A/ymEBYjtH1OFtCGhfHRCBQPA +J8OKw4F51TghF6IZOgpGBYohlI/2l14ldrXvybMZ0bqhfh6q+l1LTbU9U1IaUJQ P6Br5Yj/45nKCg8poymcc0gzB1H+dOyaaN1NKgWXcIkD3ujgbqozwjBCIbxNGtOC XcoxC7JAmS7hIoog2fAyf3f/QkM7sOBlyXqonqdJf4I6msJLrAe4f5Nv5ca1RPT3 AXeRgPMgP7wepUhV7KEtMbR9PuR5nYYMiukoXsJXKFMVX/xUYVlwZfODaphcEqTK ZZsGo4X7pvhFafm92TZncI8dYg/oDgyhxrLjmSodraYCiOeNFQpl/v1FWzluQzip h8Cg9ZJy3F37D0hEOBwgQs5XBdAQD73OssRbmgepn1K5c9sDjqY= =q3BW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--