From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 8KWXMbNixl7RXQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 11:14:59 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id iPtsLbNixl4pIQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 11:14:59 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F12B09404D8 for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 11:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44092 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbjA9-00033S-Su for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 07:14:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbjA2-00033L-TV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 07:14:50 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x12f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f]:37397) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbjA1-0003at-PN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 07:14:50 -0400 Received: by mail-il1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id n11so6686550ilj.4 for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 04:14:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=7beetN/rbHLoBBdofDMUvX/WcMNq8kN1eZKC3AFIRNs=; b=rkXzeF//DccW7WL+rBPIL64PuQmYSxjM14ncUG6sVFCugrORNLyp0CXCgtd5frmFBP amZDfjBhhPy6dVufODKJ8qkKQKlebludHCx1+S9owwLR/jQ/lAc5chP8ddoStl1AGafm twrMtfBPyDF+v72rdNegZHgmsp/GlONP0xevWaSRnOQ5sWOGlp60UWWCzwESbVq2MNqB fgT5Y8snJzpoAF7rC3uaQPbYeL+vM9CMRUFltM7P7rGTbTfhMPwb9n0sBrIEKYiw/Jd3 i+MO0XpCVsqXkw+KUMTaSHbx1P0yMBx1DdOs6fyxAsjEA4PT5JDwYoo0ltYTuuuL6afu Eahg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=7beetN/rbHLoBBdofDMUvX/WcMNq8kN1eZKC3AFIRNs=; b=S+MJ8Q04vdQOKg9Q0TkbfI6M0oaT90nlqNsLEIz0vM8mb5AZ8vSzoNAt5TRugpWtAv LNDL6yFuVHUPf3CBqQSzIJKK0T5DfYWGiDZ3hQfMfqS6OyyziIt88RDwY3zr+Olx2/OY q0ozywUWTwVllBHX3xbj7XWr/+F3Y0MFn2Ce14NLYomeprh5KelyQnsGXwnCNJJvZp7W cuEg01kECe0LeY40+qZx2pwwrMtP3dcRZBJZkIZysfYObd8+jDgK3Rg5I8AuEYi2fshU 98odD+jcaADT7TAhvyZN/53onA3vwLDZsptFhsklYE+u5UyiMeGMu1SBldww1yzb3Xwe y7tg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+Tctia52BJ7KFOsV6ZOS/vRBKLmsF/vmU2A4+ixARW8kyIEe2 xxobY0Q3DR/6vBUNyAPbuen8GM1f X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycB64dey90MTTTZ6j93T0DGuOcITKJ6j6i4/rhXbhWcwsnO6Z2oTOOCCoAAEIu8p1cHh+h2g== X-Received: by 2002:a92:5ec1:: with SMTP id f62mr5377415ilg.80.1590059688332; Thu, 21 May 2020 04:14:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gazelle-pro (172-221-246-205.res.spectrum.com. [172.221.246.205]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j2sm2321485ioo.8.2020.05.21.04.14.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 21 May 2020 04:14:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Katherine Cox-Buday To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: Can we increase the print width/column in daemon backtraces References: <87tvbn7ff3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k1cjihvm.fsf@elephly.net> <87h87n78yf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87muf38yzh.fsf@gmail.com> <87k117x9m7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 06:14:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87k117x9m7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Wed, 20 May 2020 11:02:08 +0200") Message-ID: <878shlczfd.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f; envelope-from=cox.katherine.e@gmail.com; helo=mail-il1-x12f.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=rkXzeF//; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: /30hlwZbgfSN Pierre Neidhardt writes: > This has stopped working for me a while ago. > Could it be that Guile's behaviour changed here? Is this increase a function of Guix, or of Guile? This is a constant source of pain for me as I package things since very useful information is often elided due to this limit (e.g. symlink failed during a build between store item `/gnu/store/xyz`...` and... ???). I would be very happy if the limit were increased at the daemon level! -- Katherine