From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id SFfMOYrt217YVwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 19:24:58 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id oJK1NYrt217OdAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 19:24:58 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75AC79401CB for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 19:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43382 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jheR7-0000tY-8u for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 15:24:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41054) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jheNY-0006UY-L8; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 15:21:16 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd36.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d36]:45262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jheNX-00063C-TZ; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 15:21:16 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-xd36.google.com with SMTP id y5so14215351iob.12; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 12:21:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=UrC9jlIpOXdYrxyaGavPtPZGg5BznLTiL9nIYRXbHQQ=; b=bUybjm6dLmJnA+gW/LgGZq1vwJ+iy1WFZ+HXrHhYTyUXlzNFk74wBklgHghWxYYYap cgss34C/Bs6PYPatrdiPLsAc1DVqXj2oVub55G1xpgti6AdU23YSAPbaeDFTgS8FglRk xwB2Y6wEotk/Yzq6mFSY6+247QDMobx8HBdWm3MbEOlkDeg/S0TwwL1AD2HqsBTXX3/1 4MVGoLb9jXlLxCWb8pis1ELENEWn2/QWO3eEyDVeFfzimYal5Prwb/6Xj9qwahb6MfVc XKl/z36mgralsUI2HBiTOgvLBAWcDSES8a3dAHt2ozc+sOkELgTgVnjd27kNmx/k8cQJ NPTg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=UrC9jlIpOXdYrxyaGavPtPZGg5BznLTiL9nIYRXbHQQ=; b=o4Gf2sNMOjlqe/Gvh4JCYrCJxZNVfbVDdiImYeOutv/jmGwbhd7ESQlceBzHgudNr0 zUygSOb0ivs/TtZU1NrVV/Ac2/mukt2EinTz7Y0hGVDQldhDyTpjM4Yhiit/pS4f1KNC nMIPBiXAtqFE3EeOaEl2n7K4vmvhrD0surQRa5BksOa0OF+yNB0t+ZpGv/maei7Ll5jo jIzkHT6gI6JaotBPPDpF7sreMMCnH2gf89AaqgzYYkkov57uVKFntlGcvJWPtj+UghLA MXSv+FK+BEbF0SIyjP2RGTaTfmfRtfckLcoSYwMd+MjEyjdFYQfvULHAF7xhg2brRrOG GtVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53049DOOFf35D+uKyvmqc6cyhV07yTXr7rSQI5CmD/iqReHaOX+W ws3uypuLBaIW7r8GaxEQNNrWl07u X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwfeKbU1M90B8mYWAylbbF4VrF8/EH9xSjct3T4sldA0kHFvM+v5B0xdGGw74IRXD9eKadf+g== X-Received: by 2002:a02:3402:: with SMTP id x2mr13718604jae.11.1591471272715; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 12:21:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gazelle-pro (172-221-246-205.res.spectrum.com. [172.221.246.205]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a2sm4167420iln.38.2020.06.06.12.21.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 06 Jun 2020 12:21:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Katherine Cox-Buday To: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: The size of =?utf-8?B?4oCYLmdv4oCZ?= files References: <875zc5z18d.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1usli5f.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 14:21:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87r1usli5f.fsf@gnu.org> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Sat, 06 Jun 2020 10:20:44 +0200") Message-ID: <878sh00zmi.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::d36; envelope-from=cox.katherine.e@gmail.com; helo=mail-io1-xd36.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel , Guile Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=bUybjm6d; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: GulU7ePf+49k Mathieu Othacehe writes: > Having a lighter disk-image isn't very important on desktop, but for the > embedded devices with small eMMC, any improvement would be really > welcome :) I was recently discussing a Guix buildbox container image I put together with a coworker, and one of the tremendous downsides was the size of the image. I think smaller images are important all around! I'm looking forward to seeing your work. -- Katherine