unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>
To: "Vincent Legoll" <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>,
	"Andreas Enge" <andreas@enge.fr>,
	"Efraim Flashner" <efraim@flashner.co.il>,
	"Léo Le Bouter" <lle-bout@zaclys.net>,
	"Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>,
	zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Let's include powerpc64le-linux in the next release (was: Re: Release on April 18th?)
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 21:03:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878s6n7nk7.fsf_-_@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87czw4z01x.fsf_-_@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Fri,  12 Mar 2021 10:42:02 -0800")

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2904 bytes --]

Hi,

I have good news!

Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com> writes:

> Subject: [PATCH] syscalls: mount: Fix a matching bug.

If there are no concerns about this patch, I will commit it to master
(with the "mount" typo fixed so it reads "mounts") in the next few days.

> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:
>
>> I'm now running make guix-binary.powerpc64le-linux.tar.xz and so far
>> it's made it past the initial building stages, we're on to building the
>> grafts now.
>
> Thank you.  This fixed the patch-related problem for me, too.  I'm
> currently running "make guix-binary.powerpc64le-linux.tar.xz", also, on
> my Debian ppc64le machine.  We'll see how far it gets - fingers crossed!

I'm happy to report that I was able to do all of the following things
successfully on the wip-ppc64le-for-master branch after (1) applying the
syscalls patch mentioned above, (2) running "make update-guix-package",
and (3) locally committing the updated guix package:

- On a bare metal Debian ppc64le machine, I ran "make
  guix-binary.powerpc64le-linux.tar.xz" successfully.

- I installed the resulting guix binary in a fresh Debian ppc64le VM
  successfully.

- In the VM, using the newly installed guix binary, I successfully ran
  "guix pull" to update Guix to the commit I made in (3) above.

- In the VM, using the newly pulled guix, I built GNU Hello and verified
  that it ran successfully.

This demonstrates that wip-ppc64le-for-master is working.  Therefore, we
should merge it to master and officially include powerpc64le-linux
support in the next Guix release!  Thank you, Efraim, for taking the
initiative to adapt some of the commits from wip-ppc64le so they could
be applied to master without rebuilding the world on other systems.

I've verified that the wip-ppc64le-for-master branch does not rebuild
the world.  I did this by verifying that the derivations for the "hello"
and "gcc-toolchain" packages were the same at the branch point as they
are at the tip of the branch (e.g.: ./pre-inst-env guix build -d hello).

As I see it, the next tasks for powerpc64le-linux in this release are:

- Do a final rebase of wip-ppc64le-for-master, then merge it to master.

- When the release happens, make a guix-binary.powerpc64le-linux.tar.xz
  available wherever binary releases are normally published.

- Start building powerpc64le-linux substitutes in the build farm,
  ideally on POWER9 hardware.

How shall we build the binary tarball for the release?  Of course,
anybody with a copy of the (source) release tarball can build their own
guix binary by invoking "make guix-binary.powerpc64le-linux.tar.xz"
themselves.  However, for convenience, it would be nice to provide a
pre-built binary if possible.  Shall I build this myself when the time
comes, or would people prefer to do it a different way?

-- 
Chris

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-16  4:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-02 14:51 Release on April 18th? zimoun
2021-03-02 16:00 ` Julien Lepiller
2021-03-02 20:03 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-05 14:31   ` Andreas Enge
2021-03-05 19:27     ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-05 20:20       ` zimoun
2021-03-05 20:58         ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-05 23:57           ` zimoun
2021-03-06 20:14           ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2021-03-03 14:16 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-03-03 18:51   ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-04  9:41     ` zimoun
2021-03-04 19:07       ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-04 22:18         ` zimoun
2021-03-04 22:43           ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-05 20:19     ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-05 23:58       ` zimoun
2021-03-06 18:56         ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-06 19:06     ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-06 23:22       ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-07  3:51         ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-03-07  5:39           ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-03-07 20:44             ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-07 20:56               ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-03-07 20:50             ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-08  9:38       ` zimoun
2021-03-05 20:21   ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-09 18:17 ` Chris Marusich
2021-03-09 21:32   ` Vincent Legoll
2021-03-10  8:30     ` Release on April 18th? (ppc64le support specifically) Efraim Flashner
2021-03-11  9:10     ` Release on April 18th? Chris Marusich
2021-03-12  8:02       ` Vincent Legoll
2021-03-12 18:42         ` Chris Marusich
2021-03-12 18:52           ` Chris Marusich
2021-03-14 12:31           ` Vincent Legoll
2021-03-15 16:36           ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-03-16  4:03           ` Chris Marusich [this message]
2021-03-16  7:08             ` Let's include powerpc64le-linux in the next release (was: Re: Release on April 18th?) Efraim Flashner
2021-03-16  8:10               ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-03-23 13:42             ` Let's include powerpc64le-linux in the next release Ludovic Courtès
2021-03-23 13:47               ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-03-23 14:01               ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2021-03-30  8:23                 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-03-30 22:20                   ` Vincent Legoll
2021-03-23 17:09               ` Let's include powerpc64le-linux in the next release, " Chris Marusich
2021-03-10 13:27   ` Release on April 18th? zimoun
2021-03-10 15:30     ` Efraim Flashner
2021-03-10 15:59       ` zimoun
2021-03-10 18:33         ` Efraim Flashner
2021-03-11  8:58       ` Chris Marusich
2021-03-11 13:30         ` Efraim Flashner
2021-03-12  8:33           ` Chris Marusich
2021-03-12 10:11             ` Andreas Enge
2021-03-12 13:43             ` Efraim Flashner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-02-28  6:53 I've rebased wip-ppc64le onto core-updates Chris Marusich
2021-02-28 20:42 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-03-01 19:14   ` Tobias Platen
2021-03-01 21:36   ` jbranso
2021-03-10 10:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-03-10 10:37   ` Efraim Flashner
2021-03-11  8:24   ` Chris Marusich
2021-03-11  8:37     ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-03-15 16:25     ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-03-16  4:26       ` I've rebased wip-ppc64le onto core-updates, Re: Release on April 18th? Chris Marusich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878s6n7nk7.fsf_-_@gmail.com \
    --to=cmmarusich@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreas@enge.fr \
    --cc=efraim@flashner.co.il \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=lle-bout@zaclys.net \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=vincent.legoll@gmail.com \
    --cc=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).