From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add Lilypond. Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 09:41:09 +0100 Message-ID: <877fupqm6y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87fv9f8tnz.fsf@mango.localdomain> <4f4a3e65a02ff3123d15edf64781de6b@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46071) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVFj2-0007vc-7L for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 04:41:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVFix-0002je-QO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 04:41:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4f4a3e65a02ff3123d15edf64781de6b@openmailbox.org> (Eric Bavier's message of "Mon, 09 Mar 2015 15:43:01 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Bavier Cc: Guix-devel Eric Bavier skribis: > I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond). > What do others think? +1