From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: Add agg. Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:40:28 +0100 Message-ID: <877fuedooz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20150318105410.2359.97929@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87r3smfo4i.fsf@gnu.org> <20150318134720.GA27555@venom> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57631) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYKlb-0005wj-Oo for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:40:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYKlX-00047v-G3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:40:39 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:39823) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYKlX-00047o-57 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:40:35 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:56125 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYKlS-0007fN-Ha for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:40:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150318134720.GA27555@venom> (=?utf-8?B?IlRvbcOhxaEgxIxl?= =?utf-8?B?Y2giJ3M=?= message of "Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:47:20 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 =C4=8Cech skribis: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:09:49PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>Tomas Cech skribis: [...] >>> +@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ >>> + AC_PROG_CC >>> + AC_PROG_CXX >>> + AC_ISC_POSIX >>> +-AM_C_PROTOTYPES >>> + if test "x$U" !=3D "x"; then >>> + AC_MSG_ERROR(Compiler not ANSI compliant) >>> + fi >> >>It is best to avoid modifying .ac or .am files because that requires >>adding a dependency on the autotools.] > > I will remember that but I'm afraid that in this case there is no > configure in tarball anyway and has to be generated. Oh, right, sorry for the confusion! If that has to be generated anyway, then fine, no problem. >>What problem does this patch solve? I=E2=80=99m confident this can be wo= rked >>around without modifying the .ac file, for instance by passing the right >>ac_cv_ variable as a =E2=80=98configure=E2=80=99 argument. > > > AM_C_PROTOTYPES has been removed from automake. > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2011-06/msg00082.html Right, so you made the right decision. Just mention it in the patch. Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99.