From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: State of dbus-update
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:04:05 +0100
Message-ID: <877fm7826y.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20151028125844.GA6548@debian>
	<idjtwpb5buq.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38160)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ZrSGp-0000IR-TQ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:04:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ZrSGm-0004Fx-Jy
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:04:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <idjtwpb5buq.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's
	message of "Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:03:41 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> skribis:

> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:
>
>> The fix for ardour-3 is not enough:
>>    http://hydra.gnu.org/build/758432
>> Is the package still needed, or could it be dropped in favour of ardour-=
4?
>
> I think we can drop it and just leave Ardour 4.

Is there a reason someone might still prefer to use Ardour 3?

If not, please go ahead and remove it.

Ludo=E2=80=99.