unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Move cursynth to music.scm
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 00:33:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877fjwzv7e.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k2nx4tq6.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Tue, 29 Dec 2015 08:08:49 +0100")

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:

> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 05:17:15PM -0600, Eric Bavier wrote:
>>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:09:09 -0500
>>> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
>>> 
>>> > I think it would be better for this software synthesizer to be in
>>> > music.scm.
>>> > 
>>> > Thoughts?
>>> 
>>> IIRC, the original thought was that many GNU packages have their own
>>> modules, so this was done for cursynth as well.
>>
>> Okay, sure.
>
> I think it would be nice to have cursynth in “music.scm”.

+1

>> To be honest, I don't understand the reasoning behind grouping packages
>> into modules. Is it just for humans or is there some technical reason
>> for it?
>
> It’s mostly for humans AFAIU.  Personally, I prefer try to avoid a
> proliferation of one-off modules; maybe because I don’t like the
> boilerplate (license header, module definition with imports, adding the
> module to “gnu-system.am”).

Same here.

More modules also lead to more I/O for the various commands.

Ludo’.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-29 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-28 23:09 [PATCH 0/1] Move cursynth to music.scm Leo Famulari
2015-12-28 23:09 ` [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Move cursynth to (gnu packages music) Leo Famulari
2015-12-28 23:17 ` [PATCH 0/1] Move cursynth to music.scm Eric Bavier
2015-12-29  4:32   ` Leo Famulari
2015-12-29  7:08     ` Ricardo Wurmus
2015-12-29  9:14       ` Alex Kost
2015-12-29 10:50       ` Leo Famulari
2015-12-29 23:33       ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2015-12-30  1:10         ` Leo Famulari
2015-12-31  2:31           ` Leo Famulari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877fjwzv7e.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=rekado@elephly.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).