From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: add lispf4
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 09:10:30 +0100
Message-ID: <877fi7u2yx.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <87y4ax3cf2.fsf@grrlz.net> <87wpqgea7v.fsf@grrlz.net>
	<20160208003608.GA6080@jasmine> <877fifxxgg.fsf@grrlz.net>
	<20160208201442.GB2854@jasmine> <87twliekjc.fsf@grrlz.net>
	<20160209091632.0453f67c@debian-netbook> <87egcggd88.fsf@grrlz.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43497)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aUrlS-00081V-M1
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 03:10:43 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aUrlP-0007cm-82
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 03:10:42 -0500
Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:25531)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aUrlO-0007cS-V7
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 03:10:39 -0500
In-reply-to: <87egcggd88.fsf@grrlz.net>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nils Gillmann <niasterisk@grrlz.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


Nils Gillmann <niasterisk@grrlz.net> writes:

> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:
>
>> On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 02:31:51 +0100
>> Nils Gillmann <niasterisk@grrlz.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
>>> 
>>>  [...]  
>>>  [...]  
>>>  [...]  
>>>  [...]  
>>>  [...]  
>>>  [...]  
>>>  [...]  
>>>  [...]  
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> But now as I did guix pull and installed it from there, and do
>>> not run it inside guix environment, I encounter an error I did
>>> not see coming as it worked in the environment.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> niasterisk@khazad-dum ~$ guix package -i lispf4
>>> The following package will be installed:
>>>    lispf4	0.0.0-1-174d876	/gnu/store/7rkw1rhn4ijap9b936waspki03260lpb-lispf4-0.0.0-1-174d876
>>> 
>>> 56 packages in profile
>>> niasterisk@khazad-dum ~$ lispf4
>>> Can't open 'SYSATOMS'
>>> niasterisk@khazad-dum ~$ ls -al /gnu/store/7rkw1rhn4ijap9b936waspki03260lpb-lispf4-0.0.0-1-174d876/bin/
>>> total 200
>>> dr-xr-xr-x 2 root guixbuild  4096 Jan  1  1970 ./
>>> dr-xr-xr-x 3 root guixbuild  4096 Jan  1  1970 ../
>>> -r--r--r-- 3 root guixbuild 94972 Jan  1  1970 BASIC.IMG
>>> -r-xr-xr-x 7 root guixbuild 92088 Jan  1  1970 lispf4
>>> -r--r--r-- 7 root guixbuild  2105 Jan  1  1970 SYSATOMS
>>> 
>>> I checked ~/.guix-profile/bin/ and it's there, all three files.
>>> For what I know, SYSATOMS includes allowed commands, that's it.
>>> My guix checkout I develop with is in my home folder, permissions
>>> for my daily user and all checked in guix environment.
>>> 
>>> Any Ideas?
>>
>> If you replace the install phase sometimes you have to change the permissions
>> yourself. Try searching for #o555.
>
> Okay, I just tried #o555 and #o644 in individual builds for both
> files. Both builds produced the same mistake which currently
> keeps lispf4 from running ("can't open 'SYSATOMS'").

Could it be a search-path problem?  Try running

    strace -f lispf4

to see where lispf4 looks for SYSATOMS and what the exact error is as it
tries to open the file.  Does it find it at all?

~~ Ricardo