From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: service: make hidden-service an alias of onion service Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 10:47:24 +0200 Message-ID: <877fghk95v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bn5uv6e1.fsf@grrlz.net> <878u0ybakr.fsf@gnu.org> <87io02jnkz.fsf@grrlz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56110) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aluju-0002y6-Dl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 04:47:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alujr-0000VX-5V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 04:47:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87io02jnkz.fsf@grrlz.net> (Nils Gillmann's message of "Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:21:16 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nils Gillmann Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Nils Gillmann skribis: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> Nils Gillmann skribis: >> >>> It seems that recently the torproject started using the more >>> appropriate term "onion service"[1] for what is known as "hidden >>> service". >> >> You=E2=80=99re missing the footnote. :-) >> >> Ludo=E2=80=99. > > Right :D > > Well anyway, starting this anchor there should be more context > and links: > > https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2016-03-31#T984352 At , I see that =E2=80=9CTor developers use the terms "hidden services" and "onion services" interchangeably.=E2=80=9D No evidence that there=E2=80=99s a inc= entive to use =E2=80=9Conion services=E2=80=9D, or did I miss it? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.