From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] avrdude: Build with libusb-compat. Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 21:39:56 +0200 Message-ID: <877fdd2h2r.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87d1n57mxt.fsf@elephly.net> <20160625174638.GD22624@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33857) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGtR8-0006aq-MF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 15:40:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGtR4-0000gU-45 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 15:40:14 -0400 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:24847) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGtR3-0000cf-RT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 15:40:10 -0400 In-reply-to: <20160625174638.GD22624@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel Leo Famulari writes: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 09:22:06AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> * gnu/packages/patches/avrdude-fix-libusb.patch: Remove file. >> * gnu/packages/flashing-tools.scm (avrdude)[source]: Remove patch. >> [inputs]: Replace "libusb" with "libusb-compat". > > If we delete the patch file, we will want to remove the reference in > gnu/local.mk, right? Yes, you’re right. I’ll add that. What’s important for me to know, though, is whether the use of the latest libusb and the patch are supposed to work already and if it would be bad to use libusb-compat. ~~ Ricardo