From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] gnu: Add python-gunicorn. Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 22:23:50 +0000 Message-ID: <877fa10weh.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> References: <20160913013827.25877-1-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160913013827.25877-7-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <57D7F2A8.3090505@crazy-compilers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41649) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnvMY-0003VH-8u for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 18:24:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnvMT-0008P7-7L for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 18:24:02 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:53727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnvMT-0008O0-0W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 18:23:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <57D7F2A8.3090505@crazy-compilers.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Hartmut Goebel , guix-devel@gnu.org Hartmut Goebel writes: > Am 13.09.2016 um 03:38 schrieb ng0: >> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-gunicorn): New variable. > > I submitted a patch for adding this to gnu/packages/web.scm. Okay. Is there anything more python related you are about to add, so I can avoid further duplicate work? Considering the last private conversation: I think we should exchange regulary (off-list, in private) what we are working on so our work can be more effective (less collisions etc). What do you think? > Additionally I questioned whether this package should be called only > "gnunicorn" since it it not a python *package* but a program. I would've called it gunicorn, looking at it now. > -- > Regards > Hartmut Goebel > > | Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com | > | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible | > > > -- ng0