From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Re: Guile 2.0.13 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:26:29 -0500 Message-ID: <877f9dctka.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <8760oxpwsd.fsf@gnu.org> <20161012163542.GA32216@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45563) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buOEs-0007Ms-3U for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:26:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buOEo-0008G0-0u for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:26:50 -0400 In-reply-to: <20161012163542.GA32216@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 02:38:26PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > Considering that 2.0.13 fixes a bug that is exposed by grafting, it's a > bit of shame to provide it with a graft. But if we are too far along, > it's understandable. > > We could always un-graft it between releases if Hydra isn't busy. Ha... that's an interesting point. Hopefully most Guix users have gotten the message, "don't use localhost + port"... most Guix users are probably paying attention closely to Guile happenings, if any community was? But of course, we really don't want to put our users at risk. - Chris