From: "Clément Lassieur" <clement@lassieur.org>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>,
Tatiana Sholokhova <tanja201396@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: packaging Bootstrap for Cuirass' web interface
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 12:18:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877elhj81c.fsf@lassieur.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k1phkqoo.fsf@gnu.org>
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> Or maybe like this:
>
> (define (make-critical-section . args)
> "Return a channel used to implement a critical section. That channel can
> then be passed to 'join-critical-section', which will ensure sequential
> ordering. ARGS are the arguments of the critical section.
>
> Critical sections are implemented by passing the procedure to execute to a
> dedicated fiber."
> (let ((channel (make-channel)))
> (spawn-fiber
> (lambda ()
> (let loop ()
> (match (get-message channel)
> (((? channel? reply) . (? procedure? proc))
> (put-message reply (apply proc args))))
> (loop))))
> channel))
>
> (define (call-with-critical-section channel proc)
> "Call PROC in the critical section corresponding to CHANNEL. Return the
> result of PROC."
> (let ((reply (make-channel)))
> (put-message channel (cons reply proc))
> (get-message reply)))
>
> That makes it clear that the reply channel is used only by the calling
> fiber.
I like it, but in that case MAKE-CHANNEL is called every time
CALL-WITH-CRITICAL-SECTION is called. Do you think it is a significant
overhead?
Clément
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-27 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-23 7:48 packaging Bootstrap for Cuirass' web interface Clément Lassieur
2018-07-23 8:03 ` Gábor Boskovits
2018-07-23 9:04 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-07-23 11:29 ` Clément Lassieur
2018-07-24 20:29 ` Tatiana Sholokhova
2018-07-24 23:39 ` Clément Lassieur
2018-07-25 8:10 ` Clément Lassieur
2018-07-25 8:46 ` Clément Lassieur
2018-07-25 9:18 ` Clément Lassieur
2018-07-25 10:05 ` Gábor Boskovits
2018-07-25 10:16 ` Clément Lassieur
2018-07-26 9:07 ` Clément Lassieur
2018-07-26 13:41 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-07-27 1:43 ` Clément Lassieur
2018-07-27 8:50 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-07-27 10:18 ` Clément Lassieur [this message]
2018-07-27 17:43 ` Clément Lassieur
2018-07-29 16:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-07-26 13:39 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-07-29 23:45 ` Clément Lassieur
2018-07-26 13:42 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-07-23 9:31 ` Björn Höfling
2018-07-23 11:18 ` Clément Lassieur
2018-07-27 8:41 ` Chris Marusich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877elhj81c.fsf@lassieur.org \
--to=clement@lassieur.org \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=tanja201396@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).