From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0?
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:47:11 +0200
Message-ID: <877e869t80.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <CAJ3okZ0fgUr3j7D1ECX=Xsc+qbcxW_MMuia5TmQs8MTjKnBN0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <87pnlz9lro.fsf@elephly.net>
 <CAJ3okZ14=JBmOjDpE-w=HD-p6z3bYtsvbQzEr=sixJic8phSUg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38315)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1hqd9Y-0000WI-0U
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:47:24 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1hqd9V-00021K-VY
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:47:23 -0400
Received: from sender4-of-o53.zoho.com ([136.143.188.53]:21325)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1hqd9V-0001yZ-Kn
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:47:21 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAJ3okZ14=JBmOjDpE-w=HD-p6z3bYtsvbQzEr=sixJic8phSUg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>


zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Ricardo,
>
> Thank you for your quick feedback.
>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 23:16, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:
>>
>> That=E2=80=99s because version 1.0 is considered non-free.  =E2=80=9Clic=
enses.scm=E2=80=9D also
>> contains =E2=80=9Cclarified-artistic=E2=80=9D, which is essentially the =
same as version
>> 1.0 but with a few clarifications of those points that could be
>> interpreted as conditions making the software non-free.
>
> Thank you for the explanations.
>
> I sent an email to the maintainer to ask them to "upgrade" the
> license. Let see. :-)

It would be great if they could use the Clarified Artistic License
instead.  It=E2=80=99s really close to the Artistic 1.0, so unless they rea=
lly
want the non-free interpretation of Artistic 1.0 it should be no trouble
for them to switch.

--=20
Ricardo