From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id wAA0LnJ4xl6lMwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:47:46 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id gJEFKnJ4xl7HYQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:47:46 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D26C9404CA for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35668 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbkbx-0007AT-Bu for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 08:47:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50798) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbkah-0004kl-Tt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 08:46:27 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:52427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbkag-0005Da-Uz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 08:46:27 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F315C007E; Thu, 21 May 2020 08:46:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 21 May 2020 08:46:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=b9DkhITiArIQNAjsgmSz3Qrndu QpNHBe+6kBwDc6svg=; b=rAoSTrJQc9IIM5C6u78NbFuCm9rL3SdYDUmEvCEsTC 2aTNt/XdlUflnQxgENLn6pCs/pqP1r6PshsHwx1UOG57RV1QVKDj7s2HSwZd4tfy CzbIRUjpoSWRYSnlJsBbIqYsE6czAFMmMtmXrqpVGLgkJPn0998kgT5nYZhe0LbQ 6JGPOCOtSekjov5lbHh30a7eX6DD+thFpnPU17GsqHkSWuXf/kMBf6+5bAU3xepj F5adZwB6OjQTmyUv8BxueOev2x0AA0pzcYngqjW1SWDPOwOQhX8LIZ1YcGXDt8mf 2iWuZHhsTO9PpCae+Mx1EY95vcIqrhRipo98OGJaiFEA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=b9DkhI TiArIQNAjsgmSz3QrnduQpNHBe+6kBwDc6svg=; b=pzmZxbjTDOTYN6V1MKfvoM Jf6vU3R1X9eB4E2azUpfEqYefVmElMvW/c2lwJbTe/5ZrOmlySxCcLStYiqkwPfj 1DqXXBH4XkeSiAHq2VTaYGAHu8b/4MfSJnMsKWCDFXh6dC5wbk5RkKbzh17LVhxg 3pZtLVFI4vJ5IiZAoKy5kSCQHqe1lpU9fnZ9aj29sTF8pb+gKTwZHJwvqyFhL5ne rYgO9QmkFjZcNLYLifvPNxdn4AVJAAI7dW27J5u7f3PisWvjMbRT4CzguzVowALw saiMTR/kGSmG/JH/Hl58kmM2ATEhcTb3M4GHR22fCU/gi3kXyjlW3H+TK23wpYTg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudduuddgheehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufgjfhgffffkgggtsehgtderredtredtnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrihhu shcuuegrkhhkvgcuoehmsggrkhhkvgesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeekudegieelvddvgeeileffjeduiedtgffgieeiffehudfhgfevhfeuiefg hfehkeenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghenucfkphepkeegrddvtddvrdeikedrje ehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhgs rghkkhgvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no [84.202.68.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 19F7F3066488; Thu, 21 May 2020 08:46:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: zimoun Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: fontconfig: Add replacement with font-dejavu instead of gs-fonts. In-Reply-To: References: <20200517145012.21532-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <87ftbubtj2.fsf@devup.no> <87imgq9tcz.fsf@devup.no> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 14:46:23 +0200 Message-ID: <877dx5a21s.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.25; envelope-from=mbakke@fastmail.com; helo=out1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/21 08:45:00 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=fastmail.com header.s=fm2 header.b=rAoSTrJQ; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=pzmZxbjT; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=fastmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.81 X-TUID: YzLqTm9L+9ea --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain zimoun writes: > On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 23:41, Marius Bakke wrote: > >> Missing fonts in the manual is another known issue and was not clear >> from your initial message: . > > My initial message was on and > not on #41418; I have never commented on. Oh, your most recent messages appeared below the fontconfig patch thread on guix-devel in my MUA, so I did not make the mental link to #41282. > I do not understand why you are saying "missing font in the manual" > because I have the fonts installed; especially font-dejavu (and > gs-fonts too). The missing fonts were in images (PNG files) embedded in the manual, so it does not matter what you have installed: they are not rendered when you open the .png, unlike e.g. SVG or a rich text document. > Well, I do not understand neither how c81457a588 can work nicely and > not 23a59b180b with the exact same setup, if nothing has changed in > regard to font between these 2 parent commits of the last merge. The difference is that Pango (and its consumers) did not recognize the built-in fallback font in fontconfig which was previously 'gs-fonts', now changed to 'font-dejavu'. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl7GeB8ACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPqZlgf/Y5Vn56dTm+MZMEJRDmYPRf6BZw4OWM8eIDZ6q1YaR4ARJR8ByfkPDWcd clEJ5HcWhK2KIORmb6MJZcdOWNVPitGwGz+HBoGxCnTWdCugp+q/ppwXO5UU+5Z4 UAloOxN0eRlHKRENlUI3lhmkG2fyWhCgfi+CkTRj+mvNDoc/ekviUE/ErEkmYO/Z eAP0LSR+4P9l6o8F/yqgu+Ej8G2z4YhFip3PPss4nfqF0PxqzgAUEI6H/RuCRG3Z /XDJ7ITCUpmeXH3HH2Bi7v+Yvh3mTJ0AdebwSIWIwTEOBpPTD5mf4p+eZib/UTwN wDlSIy+85ISh5u9ewcAATAL926ERAg== =siZn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--