From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id oJfKIIYQe18wbQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:24:38 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id UE6kHIYQe19+bwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:24:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 152419404C5 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 12:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34034 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kPPXg-0002bk-VV for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 08:24:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60160) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kPPWd-00024S-Q6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 08:23:31 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57616) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kPPWc-0004zX-9u; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 08:23:30 -0400 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=35066 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kPPWS-0007wn-JN; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 08:23:29 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Subject: Re: Failing CI evaluation for testing branch References: <87a6xeura2.fsf@yamatai> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 14 =?utf-8?Q?Vend=C3=A9miaire?= an 229 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 14:23:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87a6xeura2.fsf@yamatai> (Guillaume Le Vaillant's message of "Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:41:57 +0200") Message-ID: <877ds42760.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.51 X-TUID: /xjJkAyTkXzz Hi Guillaume, Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis: > Currently no substitutes are built for the testing branch because the > evaluation fails. The log at https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/16794/log/raw > ends with: You mean the =E2=80=98staging=E2=80=99 branch? > guix/inferior.scm:247:2: ERROR: > 1. &inferior-exception: > arguments: (keyword-argument-error #f "Unrecognized keyword" () (#:= builder)) > inferior: #< pid: pipe socket: # close: # version: (0 1 1) packages: #<= promise #> table: #<= promise #>> > stack: ((#f ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1763 13)) (raise-exception ("ice-9/= boot-9.scm" 1666 16)) (raise-exception ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1668 16)) (#f ("= guix/build-system/asdf.scm" 279 2)) (thunk ("guix/packages.scm" 1397 22)) (= package-derivation ("guix/packages.scm" 1079 16)) (job ("gnu/ci.scm" 383 24= )) (filter-map ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 690 23)) (#f ("gnu/ci.scm" 497 31)) (map1= ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 585 17)) (append-map ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 672 15)) (hydra= -jobs ("gnu/ci.scm" 482 4)) (#f ("ice-9/eval.scm" 158 9)) (#f ("ice-9/eval.= scm" 158 9)) (with-exception-handler ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1735 10)) (call-wi= th-prompt ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 717 2)) (dynamic-wind ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 141= 2)) (#f (#f #f #f)) (#f ("guix/repl.scm" 92 21)) (with-exception-handler (= "ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1735 10)) (with-exception-handler ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 17= 30 15)) (#f ("guix/repl.scm" 119 7))) > > If I understand this correctly, there's a '#:builder' keyword somewhere > that is causing a problem. Does someone know where it can come from, or > how to fix the issue? Right. I=E2=80=99d look at guix/build-system/asdf.scm:279:2 on that branch= (per the inferior stack trace above). Does that give useful info? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.