From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uH+xAg/ZJmBAOQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 19:37:51 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id IKchOg7ZJmBuKgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 19:37:50 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 997362E659 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 20:37:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59934 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAeGD-0001ly-L3 for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:37:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49274) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAeDD-00070P-Em for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:34:43 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:36940) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAeDB-0002Hq-Cl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:34:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=qlaNsUWUw91Lk6IT4W8QV0qzPX2r8Er/PZTMN35sxaI=; h=date:in-reply-to: references:subject:cc:to:from; b=bAhlwpEe9Cm2j4uANi0+esj6pDCdpiDQX/mvO LN6F1JTrNCGxjg19/NlObri9ycqwzk0EyeMWLuDBD0Ug1Z+Tj5LQ6iPE3lJ7SuAxNgmYGq ErajA8X8jFT8zMc3v1ggodgjkwdAXlG1WhDIyjKG+oX/lHEmJWX/mPpc0jDqA5XPzJnZ81 xq40empiEe04CAbvMr+MKr64MiTCmzjgSyBgsad/Ow39sW5+kRUAKOpjluuySPqnsQmG1q pGTah/QBFYgtcsY32NaXCdLoKctX89vem6SJPIF02hQaSPVgTIKgJ7oZjgbdev2cKvuUHD Jj4Ogt551E7af9N62gltt6NpQ== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c9039d7d (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 19:35:23 +0000 (UTC) BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Changes to the branching workflow References: <87im6xd17e.fsf@nckx> In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 20:34:34 +0100 Message-ID: <877dndcc6t.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.66 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=bAhlwpEe; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=tobias.gr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 997362E659 X-Spam-Score: -4.66 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: i1uQutqUX00I --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Leo! Leo Famulari =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > I thought that the use of -frozen and -next might help avoid=20 > mistakes > during the active part of the cycles. Ah, there's my blind spot. What kinds of mistakes? When is it=20 harmful to push to the open branch? I say =E2=80=98the open branch=E2=80=99 because core-updates and core-updat= es-next=20 are the same thing, constantly changing its name in perfect=20 (manual!) sync with -frozen & I don't understand why (yet). Seems=20 obscure & error prone. > If someone wasn't aware of the branch status, the lack of a > 'core-updates' branch might make them think twice and ask for=20 > advice. I think they'll push and create a third one. I won't blame them. Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYCbYSg0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15P1IBAKIsWV4GUnp1lngnJUBX/MDYTpSOPaY5qNKSBF2l r+RiAQCStdmwwHL84wJ49aC0tfOQ9BNermr0sBux3UZkzZTbDw== =xMWP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--