From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id WFKODXOoi2LKYAEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 23 May 2022 17:29:55 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id MJg+DXOoi2JuxwAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 23 May 2022 17:29:55 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF9FA12AAB for ; Mon, 23 May 2022 17:29:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50060 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ntA0H-00031n-W0 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 11:29:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59810) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nt9wI-00079r-HF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 11:25:48 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36052) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nt9wI-0003AM-4W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 11:25:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=jEqnFPX/sh0sGHaJcqOdzqMN998WP3rmYiPwN760AlM=; b=N+8d5i16/nU895fnnpqt K/8vgdcU5AAONcQR3Dkz2V+3HUwu2oYfa5VwGP4zW0PHI/o+kzPYjivWaM2RsJqzb6TkU36xwsTTZ cEsbwd7rONXH3vbmb2f2YvDr8J3fC1Yz+zxOiH+0eNf95F8v362wMbIb7XgnrlG+lRhPJzwQ/ZyKY WZW9dsLANlAwSR95rjCfSB1/rb3vks/OlPs0aAq5ts4cjdmFqOCMecYVVBg4op/up75CT7ohHJnu7 fgOT89jZXC7wDNxQesABngnlmoEtbkwUYX7ihUJpghcTLnR0NVkIweplT8tyHMKC7thCaCt0JnKNW CFa15KCdzcS5Wg==; Received: from [193.50.110.143] (port=53310 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nt9wG-0003Vt-7B; Mon, 23 May 2022 11:25:45 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: guix-devel Cc: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: python-cryptography and rust [was: Re: =?utf-8?B?4oCYc3RhZ2lu?= =?utf-8?B?Z+KAmQ==?= branch is open!] References: <878rrn5vy3.fsf@inria.fr> <87v8u6bif6.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 4 Prairial an 230 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 17:25:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Efraim Flashner's message of "Mon, 16 May 2022 10:43:29 +0300") Message-ID: <877d6c46fd.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1653319794; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=jEqnFPX/sh0sGHaJcqOdzqMN998WP3rmYiPwN760AlM=; b=iXc2+/HwhQ3sjk135RbmE8oN1gpxVpREgIr5inpvqzk8dL8fvBXfFhrkxbAlJz1k3AaWLI RFT4ftvn7Fl5ZwGQA8vaOzg0PAs8OSrsk8eu562XiV9ZwNVO2WJYWpvf870QWnhgZFhLPf yJiZ8CZD12mm4nDAAucwh6MDUXehv1AbfqR1Cj3+ZuooHLMowLOb4P41e9gaW9MOizuKUF /714DdN+U9IkySoj4Nzn3CPd3eonXPtnkgimt4pla1BqxNvGN7HL8P3hrnzL36jC74VZGJ MHL1sDUgCeL51YHBIhT/IBtWFgjiWweOamX0T/ZcSGhO80NdsVxqTduEHjKbvA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1653319794; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=raGnnqB840vdCezf6NmPXLo4ykILnTFDuAQ6SsI5yvngppK5NIAGrsnDoAizo9F+jahhDe kRMK/kSz0lB1PZcQKl+G9c3RvkqRd1ugTjbVNv8TGfp/GbfoAjUN1K9kqc20JSHawrEyat R6qyEa4Y+yHFTotzImWVODrpA4htgfQWcyuPEr7AY+nrYvuqsCInA0nP07rnVHxVG96aK9 qS1nkWz8TuwV04Qm7ESnL8dFzhtKNbJn0q6TECLKgOYXW0g4T5WzYAO9lx+DzRnpWT5v4v TdKLRu0D4cGnAtYLk811TTlgC0D7kVukbOC3GvR+5nCsY9y9oQdBk1DGQvf6Zw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=N+8d5i16; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.25 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=N+8d5i16; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: CF9FA12AAB X-Spam-Score: -5.25 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: 7m3ESBptF/qN Hello, Efraim Flashner skribis: > On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 11:22:05PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: [...] >> Yes, so what do you mean? Should we keep the old 3.3.1 for use on >> non-x86_64 platforms? Would that even work? > > I'll add 3.4.8 for non-x86_64 platforms and see if I can do something > about the rust inputs for python-cryptography, to shorten the graph a > bit and note which crates are "locked" in their current versions. OK. >> Besides, since mrustc was updated on =E2=80=98staging=E2=80=99, does tha= t new version >> better support platforms other than x86_64? > > I hear we should be able to do aarch64 with our new version of mrustc > but I haven't tried building it yet on my machines. On i686 as well maybe? > I'd leave it as a happy bonus for now and leave aarch64 with the C > counterparts for this round, rather than relying on the rust bootstrap > chain, considering how much RAM it can use. Yup, makes sense. We can try that eventually on a branch. Ludo=E2=80=99.