From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: 'sudoers' vs. 'hosts-file' Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 23:48:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87616q6jxl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h9qaihi1.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38475) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z4FlD-0005Eg-JA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 17:48:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z4FlC-0004bK-OA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 17:48:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h9qaihi1.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Sun, 14 Jun 2015 15:47:34 +0300") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost skribis: > Since there is no real difference between 'sudoers' and 'hosts-file' > fields (of operating-system declaration), what about renaming one of > them? Makes sense. > So it could be either: > > 'sudoers-file' and 'hosts-file' > > or > > 'sudoers' and 'hosts' > > (I prefer the latter variant) I prefer the former because the value is really a file, and not, say, a list of user names or a list of host names. WDYT? Would you like to send a patch? Ludo=E2=80=99.