From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paul van der Walt <paul@denknerd.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ghc-regex-tdfa-rc.
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:00:36 +0200
Message-ID: <87611zq76z.fsf@denknerd.org>
References: <1445483479-19104-1-git-send-email-ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
	<1445503671-30014-1-git-send-email-ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
	<1445503671-30014-12-git-send-email-ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58830)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paul@denknerd.org>) id 1ZpHMa-0007NE-Lz
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:01:14 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paul@denknerd.org>) id 1ZpHMW-00056l-ET
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:01:08 -0400
Received: from mx01.mykolab.com ([95.128.36.1]:65220 helo=mx-out02.mykolab.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paul@denknerd.org>) id 1ZpHMR-00053R-JX
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:01:04 -0400
In-reply-to: <1445503671-30014-12-git-send-email-ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: ericbavier@openmailbox.org
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


On 2015-10-22 at 10:47, quoth ericbavier@openmailbox.org:
>> +    (inputs
>> +     `(("ghc-mtl" ,ghc-mtl)))
>
> I would be surprised if this did not also need to be propagated, but I confess
> I do not know of a reliable way to check.

Works for me.  Maybe we should look at this stuff after the
native-search-path patch has been applied.

>> +    (home-page
>> +     "http://hackage.haskell.org/package/regex-tdfa")
>> +    (synopsis "Replaces/Enhances Text.Regex")
>
> How about: "Tagged DFA regex engine for Haskell"

Fixed.