From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Lirzin Subject: Re: Create help-guix@gnu.org? Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:45:09 +0100 Message-ID: <8760zrl62i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h9jblxu3.fsf@gnu.org> <567820F0.2090603@gmx.net> <46d68bfc743849f7a98a6631e74b35e9@openmailbox.org> <56783089.7090903@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34964) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBA8n-0000LA-3V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 18:45:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBA8m-0000Ns-7d for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 18:45:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <56783089.7090903@gmx.net> (Florian Paul Schmidt's message of "Mon, 21 Dec 2015 18:02:01 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Florian Paul Schmidt Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, guix-devel-bounces+ericbavier=openmailbox.org@gnu.org Hi everyone, Florian Paul Schmidt writes: > On 21.12.2015 17:21, Eric Bavier wrote: >>>> Should we create a help-guix@gnu.org mailing list specifically >>>> to answer user questions? >>>=20 >>> Consistent naming schemes are important. I object. How about >>>=20 >>> guix-help@gnu.org >>=20 >> I would agree with this, but we already have bug-guix@gnu.org. >>=20 >> Ludo, are email list names in any GNU guidelines? I don't think there is a guideline, but there is tradition (sometimes not followed) of conventional names for GNU mailing lists, which are: info-FOO@gnu.org help-FOO@gnu.org bug-FOO@gnu.org FOO-devel@gnu.org See https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ for a list of all GNU mailing lists. > Also keep in mind auto completion :) bug-guix always irked me as odd.. > > Flo I agree that such name might feel more =E2=80=9Cnatural=E2=80=9D in some se= nse. Nonetheless I don't think it makes sense to break a convention for such little benefit. So I encourage everyone to stop following their mood of the day in regards of choosing a name. Please! :) -- Mathieu Lirzin