From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add dlib. Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:33:44 +0100 Message-ID: <8760qr5o8n.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <20160815222840.GA10735@jasmine> <4752bc68-5466-6c26-a7b4-e53aec400ff5@uq.edu.au> <8760r10z7n.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20160816204736.GA25753@jasmine> <993034f9-ceae-525f-01b9-0b8af7a5aafe@uq.edu.au> <20160816234507.GA24224@jasmine> <87h9ajzc1z.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20160818202353.GB2393@jasmine> <8737m1yqru.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20160821201757.GA21038@jasmine> <6004b842-2434-9cdc-7a31-04231eac5941@uq.edu.au> <87k2f957wt.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcGWT-0000O0-II for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:34:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcGWN-0005n6-JZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:34:04 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:46064) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcGWL-0005dF-BM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:33:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k2f957wt.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ben Woodcroft , Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel , Alex Kost > Without OpenBLAS dlib will use an internal BLAS implementation. I'm > fairly certain that will at least fix the crash on x86_64, which was > a segfault in libopenblasp-r0.2.15.so when we had LAPACK in inputs, but > seems to consistently trigger on Hydra regardless. > > I got busy this weekend, but will try to reproduce the i686 errors this > week; and also check if the newer openblas in core-updates solves the > x86_64 segfault. > > Stay tuned... Short update: I can successfully reproduce the i686 test failures simply by `guix build --system=i686-linux` on x86_64. Removing OpenBLAS from inputs had no effect. Now to figure out what's going on.. Marius