From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefan =?utf-8?Q?Reich=C3=B6r?= <stefan@xsteve.at>
Subject: Re: gnu: Add xonsh
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:06:05 +0200
Message-ID: <8760pgqfua.fsf@xsteve.at>
References: <87d1jxt42t.fsf@xsteve.at>
	<20160921231828.602536a6@scratchpost.org>
	<20160927165908.GC2497@jasmine>
	<20160927213801.75ce5963@scratchpost.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51389)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gcggd-guix-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1bpFVm-0006au-6l
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:07:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gcggd-guix-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1bpFVg-00016I-8V
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:07:02 -0400
Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=39588 helo=blaine.gmane.org)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gcggd-guix-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1bpFVg-000151-1b
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:06:56 -0400
Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <gcggd-guix-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1bpFVN-0003wm-3r
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:06:37 +0200
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: guix-devel@gnu.org

Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> writes:

> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:59:08 -0400
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
>
>> Should it block the package? Or perhaps we can push the patch as-is and
>> you can submit a follow-up to add the features you want?
>
> It's fine to use as-is, it just looks like a shell from 1973 :)
>
> LGTM.
>
> Also, I've tested Stefan's package and it works.

I think it should work in that configuration. I am just starting to use
it. For me it has the potential to be the shell for 2023 ;-)

Stefan.