From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Subject: Re: gnu: artanis: Remove implied $(DESTDIR) usage.
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:27:18 +0100
Message-ID: <8760orjbjt.fsf@duckhunt.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
References: <1476582044.11070.21.camel@adfeno-VPCEG17FB>
	<87k2d7oh8f.fsf@duckhunt.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<1476708861.14447.3.camel@adfeno-VPCEG17FB>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55426)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1bw8sw-0005hk-4t
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:27:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1bw8sr-0000CL-7x
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:27:26 -0400
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:50352)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1bw8sr-0000C0-3N
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:27:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1476708861.14447.3.camel@adfeno-VPCEG17FB>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno@openmailbox.org>, guix-devel@gnu.org

Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno@openmailbox.org> writes:

> Oh my! ... Sorry for being careless. I guess I was so happy to finally
> fix the problem upstream that I forgot to adapt our recipe accordingly.
>
> Thanks for testing. :)
>
> I have made the patch again, and also properly referenced the patch
> tickets from upstream.

Thanks! I made slight adjustments to the commit message and kept the
original (let* ((out ...))) to make it clearer what the patch does.

Pushed as 8a666bc5cb3c50b4b881290c7776c3f681a734bc !