From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: libreoffice: Add 'libreoffice' symlink. Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 14:16:34 +0000 Message-ID: <8760mycvgd.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> References: <20161205122551.12427-1-ng0@libertad.pw> <20161205122551.12427-2-ng0@libertad.pw> <58456029.4010102@crazy-compilers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43145) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDu4u-0006Ht-I6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 09:17:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDu4r-0004hU-8Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 09:17:12 -0500 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:51877) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDu4r-0004h4-0w for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 09:17:09 -0500 Received: from [10.9.9.212] (helo=mailfront12.runbox.com) by bars.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDu4n-0004Xw-Ck for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 15:17:05 +0100 Received: from 91.ip-164-132-51.eu ([164.132.51.91] helo=localhost) by mailfront12.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1cDu4L-0004l2-77 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 15:16:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <58456029.4010102@crazy-compilers.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hartmut Goebel writes: > Am 05.12.2016 um 13:25 schrieb ng0: >> + (symlink >> + (string-append out "/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice") >> + (string-append bin "/libreoffice"))) > > That's a good idea. But why not a relative sym-link? > > -- > Regards > Hartmut Goebel > > | Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com | > | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible | > > > Okay, I have no preference for the symlink type or how it's done. Feel free to co-author your bits, there's no way I'm building libreoffice for the 8th time in 3 days for this minor change. -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 | ng0.chaosnet.org