From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Update 'geiser' hash and deprecate 'geiser-next'. Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 23:23:50 +0100 Message-ID: <8760mv74zt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87shqa9h4l.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38762) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEkd2-0002z4-9f for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 17:23:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEkcz-0001Wz-38 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 17:23:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87shqa9h4l.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:16:10 +0300") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost skribis: > As several people noticed, the release tarball of Geiser 0.9 was updated > in place some time ago. > > The story is: Federico found that Geiser 0.9 does not contain some files > for Chibi and Chez, so he let the upstream know about it=C2=B9, and added > 'geiser-next' package=C2=B2. Then JAOR (the maintainer of Geiser) updated > 0.9 tarball in place. > > So since Geiser 0.9 contains those missing files for Chibi and Chez now, > I think we can deprecate 'geiser-next' again (along with updating the > hash of the 'geiser' source tarball), WDYT? Definitely, please push! Thanks, and sorry for the delay. Ludo=E2=80=99.