From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Re: Guix package incubator (later a channel) Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 12:59:22 -0600 Message-ID: <8760klzv1x.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <20170206190923.GA3592@mail.thebird.nl> <20170206214447.llpuellztfya6px5@wasp> <20170207054251.GA6888@mail.thebird.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38077) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbAz8-0000rj-V7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:59:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbAz7-0003Ok-VJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:59:27 -0500 Received: from dustycloud.org ([2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:feae:cb51]:56496) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbAz7-0003OY-Qb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:59:25 -0500 In-reply-to: <20170207054251.GA6888@mail.thebird.nl> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pjotr Prins Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Pjotr Prins writes: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:44:48PM +0000, ng0 wrote: >> Just a reply on the notabug question (I don't have much time otherwise): >> Notabug will eventually move to an instance of pagure.io, you can read >> about this in their own issues where I asked about some question back >> then (no link, sorry .. my name was 'ng0' back on there). Developing >> with pagure might be easier (fedora and surrounding communities) >> compared to the situation they describe in the issue. >> I started packaging pagure for this reason, which is about ~85% done >> (services + pagure itself left to wrap it up ... pagure itself is more >> or less done, just the service are needed. I'm more than happy to pass >> this on (could rebase the pagure patch), as I know I have taken on some >> tasks which would be better handled by different people :) >> That is in case you want to use a GuixSD as a host, otherwise you should >> not have many problems. > > That would be a great result :). Also pagure looks very interesting - > simpler than gitlab. I like simple. It does look good: Open data: Sources, doc, ticket and pull-requests meta-data are available in the web interface but also in git repos which can thus be cloned and changed locally. That's really appealing.