From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: merging wip-gnome3.30 into staging?
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 22:17:53 +0100
Message-ID: <875zux5y4e.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <878szt629g.fsf@elephly.net> <20190109195653.GC18849@macbook41>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39084)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1ghLEk-00016K-J0
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:18:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1ghLEj-0004vR-LX
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:18:06 -0500
Received: from sender-of-o53.zoho.com ([135.84.80.218]:21759)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1ghLEj-0004tc-13
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:18:05 -0500
In-reply-to: <20190109195653.GC18849@macbook41>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, julien lepiller <roptat@lepiller.eu>


Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 08:48:27PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> Hey Guix,
>>=20
>> now that GNOME 3.30 is confirmed to be working, what do you think about
>> rebasing =E2=80=9Cwip-gnome3.30=E2=80=9D on top of =E2=80=9Cstaging=E2=
=80=9D and merging it into
>> =E2=80=9Cstaging=E2=80=9D?
>>=20
>
> Works for me. Then we can do the qt-updates branch after that. It hasn't
> been as tested as I'd like.

Actually, I see that wip-gnome3.30 changes glib, which results in
thousands of rebuilds.  It=E2=80=99s probably better then to merge wip-gnom=
e3.30
into core-updates.  I=E2=80=99ll do that instead.

--=20
Ricardo