From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: gstreamer: Skip failing test on 32-bit systems. Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 02:01:35 -0400 Message-ID: <875zorr2gw.fsf@netris.org> References: <20190613121214.23499.29535@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20190613121215.EBF7320949@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87imt95qtc.fsf@netris.org> <877e9m3qom.fsf@devup.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37625) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgNYL-0006kR-JR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 02:06:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgNYJ-0002bQ-OJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 02:06:37 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:44142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgNYJ-0002ZG-0N for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 02:06:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877e9m3qom.fsf@devup.no> (Marius Bakke's message of "Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:00:41 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Marius Bakke writes: > Mark H Weaver writes: > >> Hi Marius, >> >> guix-commits@gnu.org writes: >> >>> mbakke pushed a commit to branch staging >>> in repository guix. >>> >>> commit 2a9d89afb6fb869dd2bdf1e9f710f487786930fc >>> Author: Marius Bakke >>> Date: Thu Jun 13 14:08:32 2019 +0200 >>> >>> gnu: gstreamer: Skip failing test on 32-bit systems. >>> >>> * gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm (gstreamer)[arguments]: When building for a >>> 32-bit system, add #:phases. >> [...] >>> + ,@(if (not (target-64bit?)) >>> + ;; Skip test that fails on 32-bit systems: >>> + ;; . >>> + `(#:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases >>> + (add-before 'check 'disable-gstbufferpool-test >>> + (lambda _ >>> + (substitute* "tests/check/Makefile" >>> + (("^[[:blank:]]+gst/gstbufferpool.*$") >>> + "")) >>> + #t)))) >>> + '()))) >> >> This might be sweeping a critical bug under the rug. Does >> >> Unexpected critical/warning: gst_buffer_resize_range: >> assertion 'bufmax >= bufoffs + offset + size' failed >> >> really sound like something we can safely ignore? > > I think you are right to be concerned. I found the upstream commit that > introduced the problem. See > . *ping*? Mark