From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: bug#36855: guix system switch-generation doesn't Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:46:56 -0400 Message-ID: <875zmhm8jo.fsf@netris.org> References: <7BE8190F-A8E9-454E-8F37-FBFE42FBDE10@vllmrt.net> <87zhkkojfv.fsf@dustycloud.org> <877e7on3zd.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87h86ry5j5.fsf@gmail.com> <874l241bq6.fsf__35802.4716888153$1566814098$gmane$org@gnu.org> <87woezoj3p.fsf__10757.9769611888$1566845612$gmane$org@netris.org> <87tva2m8ki.fsf@netris.org> <87y2zdnnrl.fsf__16000.9061962896$1567017269$gmane$org@sdf.lonestar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34599) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i32z9-0000ua-Oo for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:48:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i32z8-0007LZ-RW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:47:59 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:56854) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i32z8-0007Fd-MX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:47:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y2zdnnrl.fsf__16000.9061962896$1567017269$gmane$org@sdf.lonestar.org> (Jakob L. Kreuze's message of "Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:33:18 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: "Jakob L. Kreuze" Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 36855@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Jakob, zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) writes: > Thanks for the input; I wasn't aware that the activation process was > taking so long for some people. One of Ludovic's suggestions was to > create a single derivation, rather than three, to speed up system > activation. I'll look into this further. To be clear, I don't care how long it takes to build these derivations. However, I think they should all be built before starting to activate the system. Does that make sense? On a side note, what would happen if one of those builds failed? Would the system activation be left half-done? Thanks, Mark