From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Subject: Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 19:52:27 +0100
Message-ID: <875zk0okr8.fsf@devup.no>
References: <20191018205608.45b264dc@kompiuter>
 <20191101132929.72495778@interia.pl> <87bltsommk.fsf@devup.no>
 <20191103192712.1f809410@kompiuter>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41087)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1iRKzI-0007WW-LE
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 13:52:33 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1iRKzH-0008Pu-Pt
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 13:52:32 -0500
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:43277)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1iRKzH-0008Pg-IR
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 13:52:31 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20191103192712.1f809410@kompiuter>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Jan <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Jan <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl> writes:

> On Sun, 03 Nov 2019 19:12:03 +0100
> Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You can safely ignore the 'read only' messages, they are actually just
>> warnings.
>
> Good to know, so they get applied anyway, no matter if read-only?

Correct, at least as long as you use the '--force' flag to the patch
command.  :-)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl2/IesACgkQoqBt8qM6
VPo+JggAlig9PtHvN2aKsg2Ovi+pN9M7NBuRF/JymXMtIz/mxvRx+7cYpFMFHM0A
7k9Z9WB1+p8v3MYio8Mnmm0kjPUzYCBEUa6qoRFUwVVdsXVdOgYcNyqfgy4cTzFc
h8K31LpGMsTJdS7nuk4g2Rp+J1LhIk8HLmolOiq7d/E44hwvJJOpNaz/1jtgnx5l
9Wtw/FEeGwD6Gp9k5XN60JVijVsbK7X1WMvbLjazzTAvVjc2nIZODEXl8Blrc/1E
ozpCNhusYO4MYfUtf6pmhuYEZj2CcVosfxlGhJ7A/dWP34Jb+lZi3z+5c9bLfyV8
Nf0VfE1h5hJM3rJeVbjR4Y02FEZ9MA==
=xW6P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--