From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id gJUdGHx6LV9VQgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 15:59:56 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id YN/yE3x6LV9vDgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 15:59:56 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0DB69403D2 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 15:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58822 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k44mg-0003W0-OM for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 11:59:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59228) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k44m7-00031p-Oj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 11:59:19 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21156) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k44m5-0006v9-Lu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 11:59:19 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1596815954; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=gFaWS/p+Y471btso1dWF6hQ71eff/jlLxwjycqn7qlE5BT7LugI/I3kmEfckwquarrncWQI2QflmT2gTCNT9i6NTOqN7dWAbwicMrwbbpHuLEcyVzhUaVFLiTuugGE6Sgxtm6+63/bD2dG3H4av58LNw5YMsJTGWoVkBGE8K544= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1596815954; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=w9i6tizbegrqeEWAe9uTyt68S1SA7OH1en2HigAviMg=; b=ExIAYNvs5FiUAAprGy4UW1ju/D2dxO4bokaVb6L1MHnCzhWLYFDa/p7PAbrYrxCnmRYqN+FKccWiERffAaeTGLobmsWFN/Lj0f+j0Y6G+GQwTRZiWhFllLZWRGfcFOnCzAzkc9lXRWRR8aBCd/87g9hIgED+c4V7uCVs+LzhZLU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1596815954; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=w9i6tizbegrqeEWAe9uTyt68S1SA7OH1en2HigAviMg=; b=aq98pj12fxE9hvTzQ1Wyym0Pt+wE8pNoqgsXoZYZ/gWvdGBk/0exyKOOYVOlj+aV 2U4r0umMIYpX8r0x0gg1JmKvoJVxWNnSHVoYd/sNBlSuwyF3kwbbR2OHoNsQ34eTpOh +gkPKZQ2Gobjndi6/qxjz1QPD1wWkbncUWl0LZ5g= Received: from localhost (p54ad4c6a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.76.106]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1596815949418449.84793806644745; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 08:59:09 -0700 (PDT) References: <20200807150326.4sk2lcgqxi6xf4y7@gravity> <1930592E-05B5-454A-BDA3-E57AEAB609EF@asu.edu> <20200807154617.nvwh6g7b43tdpg5y@gravity> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 26.3 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Jakub =?utf-8?B?S8SFZHppb8WCa2E=?= Subject: Re: merge wip-haskell? In-reply-to: <20200807154617.nvwh6g7b43tdpg5y@gravity> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 17:59:05 +0200 Message-ID: <875z9u78hi.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.51; envelope-from=rekado@elephly.net; helo=sender4-of-o51.zoho.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/07 11:59:15 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b=aq98pj12; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 2.99 X-TUID: MMIu/r9iTzvu Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka writes: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 08:12:36AM -0700, John Soo wrote: >> I would rather wait until some evidence that the closure size would be t= oo large. Also I=E2=80=99m not sure propagation is necessary for dependents= to find libraries or use paths from an input. > > Ricardo already explained that this is indeed the case. Yes, and for the case of pandoc it=E2=80=99s significant. The closure of ghc-pandoc is >3GiB right now and with the changes it=E2=80=99s <200MiB. T= his affects lots of R packages that need Rmarkdown, and lots of bioinfo packages. There's no doubt that moving the static libs to their own output has a significant impact on closure size. --=20 Ricardo